Peter Strzok has spent some time in the national media lately. His part in the deep state and his defiance against our duly elected president are now common knowledge. His recent firing sparked a controversy that had the media throwing temper tantrum that could put an angry three year old to shame.
Now a new, old scandal has come to light involving the laptop of Anthony Weiner. A new 500 page report has come out concerning the Hillary email scandal and the disgraced ex-congressman name has come up again. The report written by the inspector general says that on Sept. 26, 2016, as part of a sex crimes investigation, an FBI agent in New York found hundreds of thousands of emails on a laptop belonging to former Rep. Anthony Weiner, who was married at the time to Huma Abedin, a top Clinton aide. Two days later, the head of the New York FBI office told dozens of FBI executives, including Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, that the laptop had 140,000 emails possibly relevant to the Clinton investigation. The next day, on Sept. 29, the New York office told several members of the FBI’s Clinton investigation team that the emails included BlackBerry messages. That was a red flag, because although the FBI had closed the Clinton investigation in July 2016, it had never found old messages from her BlackBerry account, which theoretically, was the most likely place to contain evidence of criminal intent.
For three critical weeks the FBI sat on Anthony Weiner's laptop, which they were tasked with going through to see if there was any incriminating evidence on it against Hillary. Four insiders try to explain the delay according to the inspector's report. Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and FBI Assistant Director Bill Priestap were those insiders. They made excuses for the delay, blamed others, and showed blatant indifference for their malfeasance.
"The laptop search was not viewed as a mission-critical activity,” said Priestap in his interview with IG investigators.
Page said, "There was no particular urgency.”
"It wasn’t a ticking terrorist bomb,” said Strzok, “it goes in the queue.”
These officials were content to wait until after the election.
Priestap commented, “My team was prepared to pursue this matter in the normal course, recognizing that it might not be completed until after the presidential election." Strzok figured the laptop might yield information that the bureau would “have to review, you know, January, February 2017, whenever it gets done.”
So in other words Peter Strzok sat on Anthony Weiner's laptop full well knowing that it might contain critical evidence of a crime. Remember that at the time all of this was happening everyone thought that Hillary was going to win. The news was full of endless stories about how Trump didn't stand a chance. In my opinion the plan was to sit on the evidence then if Hillary won to quietly make it all disappear.
Priestap closed the case, and wasn’t planning to revisit it. “My focus wasn’t on Midyear anymore,” he tells the IG investigators. “Yes, we’ve got to review it. Yes, it may contain evidence we didn’t know.” But “I felt confident that we had gotten to the bottom” of the case, he concludes. “It was water under the bridge.” In a written statement, Priestap adds: “I sincerely doubted that the emails identified on [the Weiner] laptop were likely to alter our informed view of the matter, and therefore did not prioritize the follow-on work over higher priority matters.”
The higher priority matter by this point was the Russian Collusion witch hunt. Weiner's emails were considered to be irrelevant, and they were all but forgotten. Remember that the public was originally told that the laptop contained 70000 emails it has now come out that it contained twice that number 140000 emails that need to be gone through. They say that it has been determined that Weiner's emails were irrelevant to the Clinton email scandal, but there is another matter that is conveniently being swept under the rug. Remember the original reason the FBI wanted to look at the laptop was investigating a sex scandal, specifically child pornography.
According to the Wall Street Journal: The investigation into Weiner’s affairs began after the Daily Mail in the U.K. revealed that Mr. Weiner had exchanged sexually explicit messages and photos with underage girls.
So it would seem that Peter Strzok has been sitting on some pretty important evidence that could potentially send Anthony Weiner to jail for a minimum of 15 years. Now that inspectors have brought some of this to light let us hope that Anthony Weiner is brought to justice for his crimes. Some are saying that this is just the tip of the iceberg, that Anthony Weiner is a small part of a much larger ring of pedophiles in Washington DC. One thing that is clear, it is past time that this kind of corruption be exposed.
source: https://yournewswire.com/clinton-child-pornography-weiner/
Comments